This Article Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 0305735607085011v1 36/2/179    most recent References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Google Scholar Articles by Cahn, D. Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

The effects of varying ratios of physical and mental practice, and task difficulty on performance of a tonal pattern

TECHNION INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY, ISRAEL, dnrc{at}netvision.net.il

Sixty undergraduate students who had completed at least one semester of jazz improvisation were assigned to either: (a) physical practice (PP); (b) mental practice (MP); (c) combined 66 percent PP and 33 percent MP (66%PP:33%MP); and (d) combined 33 percent PP and 66 percent MP (33%PP:66%MP) groups. Subjects were to perform a 3—1—7—5 tonal pattern over two difficulty levels of chord progressions. A pre-test, a three-minute practice session, and a post-test were performed for each progression. ANCOVA results revealed significant interaction between groups and task difficulty. Post-hoc t-test revealed superior results for both MP and 33%PP:66%MP on the easy task compared with the hard task. The four groups were collapsed into two groups: (a) PP and 66%PP:33%MP, both high in percentage of PP (HPP); and (b) MP and 33%PP:66%MP, both high in percentage of MP (HMP). Post-hoc t-test revealed a significantly superior performance of the HPP to that of the HMP on the hard task.

Key Words: music performance • practice • rehearsal strategy

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?