This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Seddon, F. A. Articles by O'Neill, S. A. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

An Evaluation Study of Computer-Based Compositions by Children With and Without Prior Experience of Formal Instrumental Music Tuition

Susan A. O'Neill

Department of Psychology, Keele University, Staffordshire, U.K., ST5 5BGpsd28{at}keele.ac.uk

The aim of this study was to evaluate computer-based compositions by children with and without prior experience of formal instrumental music tuition (FIMT). Three different evaluations were employed involving music specialist and nonspecialist teachers, the children themselves, and expert ratings of melodic and rhythmic repetition and development. Participants were 32 children (aged 10 years) who had a minimum of two years of FIMT (n = 16) or no prior experience of FIMT (n = 16). Both groups were invited to compose a "piece" that "sounded good to them" using a specially designed computer-based composition programme. Results indicated that specialists and non-specialists did not differentiate between children with or without FIMT in their ratings of overall achievement. However, a factor analysis of the teachers' ratings of 15 specific characteristics revealed one factor for the non-specialists and three factors for the specialists. Specialist teachers' ratings of factor two, which was interpreted as "technical complexity", indicated higher ratings for children with FIMT than those without FIMT. Children with FIMT gave higher self-evaluations for "how good their composition sounded" than children without FIMT. Ratings of musical parameters revealed a greater use of melodic and rhythmic development by children with FIMT. Implications for music education and proposals for future empirical work are discussed.

Psychology of Music, Vol. 29, No. 1, 4-19 (2001)
DOI: 10.1177/0305735601291002


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. Barrett 'Creative collaboration': an 'eminence' study of teaching and learning in music composition Psychology of Music, April 1, 2006; 34(2): 195 - 218. [Abstract] [PDF]

				F. A. Seddon and S. A. O'Neill How does formal instrumental music tuition (FIMT) impact on self- and teacher-evaluations of adolescents' computer-based compositions? Psychology of Music, January 1, 2006; 34(1): 27 - 45. [Abstract] [PDF]

				T. Priest Self-evaluation, creativity, and musical achievement Psychology of Music, January 1, 2006; 34(1): 47 - 61. [Abstract] [PDF]

				G. Welch, S. Hallam, A. Lamont, K. Swanwick, L. Green, S. Hennessy, G. Cox, S. O'neill, and G. Farrell Mapping Music Education Research in the UK Psychology of Music, July 1, 2004; 32(3): 239 - 290. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. Mills Musical Performance: Crux or Curse of Music Education? Psychology of Music, July 1, 2003; 31(3): 324 - 339. [Abstract] [PDF]