Psychology of Music

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Register now for free online access!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hallam, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Psychology of Music, Vol. 26, No. 2, 116-132 (1998)
DOI: 10.1177/0305735698262002

The Predictors of Achievement and Dropout in Instrumental Tuition

Susan Hallam

Department of Educational Psychology and Special Educational Needs, Institute of Education, University of London, 25 Woburn Square, London, U.K.teepsha{at}ioe.ac.uk

This study, using Carroll's (1963) model of learning as a framework, considers the relative importance of time spent practising in determining learning outcomes in instrumental tuition. Carroll's model states that degree of learning is a function of time spent learning, divided by time required for learning. One hundred and nine violin and viola pupils aged 6-16 years took part in the study. Multiple regression revealed that length of time learning (beta weight .78) and ability to understand instructions (.23) were the best predictors of level of achievement (R = .88), while the quality of achievement was best predicted by the teachers' rating of musical ability (5). Dropping out was best predicted by a range of ability and attitudinal measures. The findings are discussed in relation to the ways in which the quantity and quality of attainment may be determined by different presage and process factors and the importance of developing explanatory multivariate models in the field of instrumental tuition.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Research in Music EducationHome page
D. Rohwer and J. Polk
Practice Behaviors of Eighth-Grade Instrumental Musicians
Journal of Research in Music Education, January 1, 2006; 54(4): 350 - 362.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Psychology of MusicHome page
G. Welch, S. Hallam, A. Lamont, K. Swanwick, L. Green, S. Hennessy, G. Cox, S. O'neill, and G. Farrell
Mapping Music Education Research in the UK
Psychology of Music, July 1, 2004; 32(3): 239 - 290.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Psychology of MusicHome page
A. Gabrielsson
Music Performance Research at the Millennium
Psychology of Music, July 1, 2003; 31(3): 221 - 272.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Research Studies in Music EducationHome page
S. Hallam and V. Prince
Conceptions of Musical Ability
Research Studies in Music Education, June 1, 2003; 20(1): 2 - 22.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Psychology of MusicHome page
J. McCormick and G. McPherson
The Role of Self-Efficacy in a Musical Performance Examination: An Exploratory Structural Equation Analysis
Psychology of Music, January 1, 2003; 31(1): 37 - 51.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Research Studies in Music EducationHome page
G. F. Welch
The Ontogenesis of Musical Behaviour: A Sociological Perspective1
Research Studies in Music Education, June 1, 2000; 14(1): 1 - 13.
[Abstract] [PDF]