Psychology of Music

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

SAGETRACK

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Polanka, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Psychology of Music, Vol. 23, No. 2, 177-183 (1995)
DOI: 10.1177/0305735695232005
© 1995 Society for Education, Music, and Psychology Research

Research Note: Factors Affecting Eye Movements During the Reading of Short Melodies

Mark Polanka

Department of Fine Arts, Malone College, 515 25th Street NW, Canton, Ohio 44709, USA

Eighteen subjects silently read six melodies while their eye movements were measured to determine whether factors such as subject expertise, pitch pattern size, or pitch pattern complexity affected the size of their perceptual unit, measured as saccade length. Subjects were divided into three expertise groups based on a pretest. Stimuli were six melodies in equal quarter note rhythms consisting of two pattern sizes (three note/four note) and three complexity levels for each pattern size. Dependent measures were saccade length and fixation duration. Three-note pattern melodies consisted of 19 notes, while four-note pattern melodies consisted of 25 notes. Subjects in all groups were generally found to read note by note. However, factors such as pattern complexity and pattern size did affect the size of their perceptual units. They also tended to read triadic material in larger units than stepwise material especially when that material was composed of root position triads.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Psychology of MusicHome page
A. Gabrielsson
Music Performance Research at the Millennium
Psychology of Music, July 1, 2003; 31(3): 221 - 272.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Psychology of MusicHome page
A. J. Waters and G. Underwood
Eye Movements in a Simple Music Reading Task: A Study of Expert and Novice Musicians
Psychology of Music, April 1, 1998; 26(1): 46 - 60.