Psychology of Music

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hallam, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Psychology of Music, Vol. 23, No. 2, 111-128 (1995)
DOI: 10.1177/0305735695232001
© 1995 Society for Education, Music, and Psychology Research

Professional Musicians' Approaches to the Learning and Interpretation of Music

Susan Hallam

Department of Educational Psychology and Special Educational Needs, Institute of Education, University of London, 25 Woburn Square, London, UK, WC1H OAA

The purpose of this study was to investigate the approaches of professional musicians to the learning and interpretation of music. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 22 practising freelance musicians spanning a wide range of age and experience and encompassing most of the traditional orchestral instruments. The findings were considered in relation to current psychological models of adult learning and intellectual development. Pask's (1976) model of learning provided appropriate categorisations for many of the statements made by the musicians, although intuitive and analytic approaches were also identified. In addition, considerable individual diversity was identified in the level of spontaneity or planning considered acceptable in relation to performance. The intellectual developmental scheme proposed by Perry (1970) also provided an appropriate basis for considering differential levels of musical development. Educational implications and criteria for the formulation of future models to account for the learning and interpretation of music are discussed.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Psychology of MusicHome page
H. Noice, J. Jeffrey, T. Noice, and R. Chaffin
Memorization by a jazz musician: a case study
Psychology of Music, January 1, 2008; 36(1): 63 - 79.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Psychology of MusicHome page
G. Welch, S. Hallam, A. Lamont, K. Swanwick, L. Green, S. Hennessy, G. Cox, S. O'neill, and G. Farrell
Mapping Music Education Research in the UK
Psychology of Music, July 1, 2004; 32(3): 239 - 290.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Psychology of MusicHome page
A. Gabrielsson
Music Performance Research at the Millennium
Psychology of Music, July 1, 2003; 31(3): 221 - 272.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Psychology of MusicHome page
P. N. Juslin
Five Facets of Musical Expression: A Psychologist's Perspective on Music Performance
Psychology of Music, July 1, 2003; 31(3): 273 - 302.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Psychology of MusicHome page
M. Brand
Chinese and American Music Majors: Cross-Cultural Comparisons in Motivation and Strategies for Learning and Studying
Psychology of Music, October 1, 2001; 29(2): 170 - 178.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Psychology of MusicHome page
R. Chaffin and G. Imreh
A Comparison of Practice and Self-Report as Sources of Information About the Goals of Expert Practice
Psychology of Music, April 1, 2001; 29(1): 39 - 69.
[PDF]


Home page
Psychology of MusicHome page
S. Hallam
The Predictors of Achievement and Dropout in Instrumental Tuition
Psychology of Music, October 1, 1998; 26(2): 116 - 132.
[Abstract]